| Title |
Deep learning and process understanding for data-driven Earth system science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-019-0912-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Markus Reichstein, Gustau Camps-Valls, Bjorn Stevens, Martin Jung, Joachim Denzler, Nuno Carvalhais, Prabhat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 270 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 49 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 6% |
| France | 12 | 4% |
| Spain | 9 | 3% |
| Germany | 9 | 3% |
| India | 6 | 2% |
| Italy | 6 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 5 | 2% |
| Brazil | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 50 | 19% |
| Unknown | 103 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 163 | 60% |
| Scientists | 94 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,072 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3072 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 631 | 21% |
| Researcher | 519 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 303 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 128 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 122 | 4% |
| Other | 421 | 14% |
| Unknown | 948 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 586 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 349 | 11% |
| Engineering | 281 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 224 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 147 | 5% |
| Other | 344 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1141 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 392. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#79,603
of 25,856,713 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#5,789
of 98,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,640
of 460,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#126
of 1,007 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,007 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.