↓ Skip to main content

Emergent genetic oscillations in a synthetic microbial consortium

Overview of attention for article published in Science, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
559 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
Title
Emergent genetic oscillations in a synthetic microbial consortium
Published in
Science, August 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.aaa3794
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ye Chen, Jae Kyoung Kim, Andrew J Hirning, Krešimir Josić, Matthew R Bennett

Abstract

A challenge of synthetic biology is the creation of cooperative microbial systems that exhibit population-level behaviors. Such systems use cellular signaling mechanisms to regulate gene expression across multiple cell types. We describe the construction of a synthetic microbial consortium consisting of two distinct cell types-an "activator" strain and a "repressor" strain. These strains produced two orthogonal cell-signaling molecules that regulate gene expression within a synthetic circuit spanning both strains. The two strains generated emergent, population-level oscillations only when cultured together. Certain network topologies of the two-strain circuit were better at maintaining robust oscillations than others. The ability to program population-level dynamics through the genetic engineering of multiple cooperative strains points the way toward engineering complex synthetic tissues and organs with multiple cell types.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 559 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 2%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 526 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 141 25%
Researcher 103 18%
Student > Master 61 11%
Student > Bachelor 53 9%
Professor 31 6%
Other 80 14%
Unknown 90 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 152 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 132 24%
Engineering 49 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 4%
Chemistry 22 4%
Other 72 13%
Unknown 110 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 128. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#322,725
of 25,315,460 outputs
Outputs from Science
#8,329
of 80,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,858
of 274,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#159
of 1,229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,315,460 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.